小姨多鹤
Proposed US rule barring China science collaboration sparks outcry from US scientists_我的网站
A | 8月26日消息，8月25日，由比亚迪担任全程出行合作伙伴的2026丝绸之路万里行·启迪之路在新加坡收官，比亚迪集团品牌及公关处总经理李云飞与陕西广电融媒体集团董事长张连业共同宣布丝路万里行圆满结束。 
The proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule, set to take effect in December, would mark one of the biggest overhauls of US science funding in decades, giving political appointees greater authority over grant awards previously guided by scientific peer review and requiring that they "advance the President's policy priorities," according to the Washington Post.
It would also effectively expand the 2011 Wolf Amendment, which bars scientists from using NASA funding for bilateral collaborations with China, to all federal agencies and scientists receiving federal funds, marking the largest break in US-China scientific engagement in decades, the US media outlet reported.
So far, the proposed rule has garnered nearly half a million public comments, many from scientists and leading US science bodies. A Washington Post analysis of 50,000 of those comments found that around 88 percent were negative.
The rule, initially set to take effect in October, was pushed back to December after a bipartisan stopgap funding bill temporarily halted its adoption. Unlike the Wolf Amendment, the rule does not require congressional approval to take effect.
"I do think there are still members of Congress who think we have a monopoly on knowledge. They think we're still in the Cold War Soviet era ... where we were ahead in most areas of science and technology. That is not the case with China. We are no longer the leader in many areas of science," said Tobin Smith, senior vice president for government relations and public policy at the Association for American Universities, which advocates on behalf of leading US research universities, per the Washington Post.
Scientists warn that the rule risks subjecting long-term scientific research to four-year political cycles. "We will not succeed if with every new administration we are ping-ponging back and forth about priorities," the American Association for the Advancement of Science said in a blistering comment, urging the administration to withdraw the rule. "Fast-tracking such profound changes ... hands an easy victory to nations like China," it said, the Washington Post reported.
This reflects a fundamental divide between the US government and the scientific community over how science should develop, Wang Yiwei, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that politicians tend to believe that suppressing China as a competitor would allow the US to preserve its market dominance and technological edge.
Scientists, however, tend to follow a different logic, as scientific progress depends on openness, exchanges and collaboration. If science and technology are driven solely by competition and private capital, with the ultimate goal of maintaining technological monopolies, this could create greater risks and ultimately undermine US interests as well, Wang said.
The proposed rule change is the latest salvo in a broader battle in Washington over how to respond to China's rise as a scientific superpower. In July, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) also moved to ban collaborations between scientist it funds and many Chinese research institutions and their employees, according to Science magazine.
Liu Shaoshan, director of the Center for Embodied AI at the Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society and a former US-based researcher, told the Global Times in a previous interview that the NSF's new proposed rules created a "talent wall," arguing that restrictions based on nationality, institutional affiliation, and research partnerships could reduce the global talent pool available to the US, weaken its ability to attract leading scientists, and slow scientific innovation.
Liu also said scientific advancement relies not only on discovery but also on the exchange, validation, and dissemination of knowledge.
Wang also said China has built significant strengths through its vast pool of scientists and engineers, complete industrial chains and massive application scenarios, while increasingly moving from application-oriented innovation toward original research. Against this backdrop, US technological blockades and restrictions on cooperation are unlikely to halt China's progress, but could instead isolate American scientists from China's latest research and collaboration opportunities. Such an approach could also prevent the two countries from leveraging their respective strengths and ultimately undermine US competitiveness, Wang said.
。
B | 车队7月24日从西安大唐西市发车，历经33天、行驶上万公里，横跨中国六省，穿越泰国、马来西亚，最终抵达新加坡。 据介绍，2026年是中国-东盟建立全面战略伙伴关系五周年，本次活动以“科技向新·文明向心”为主题，立足西安陆上丝路起点与新加坡海上丝路枢纽，将文化交融、科技对话、经贸互通融为一体。 国内段车队途经亳州、景德镇、杭州、武夷山，集齐香药、瓷器、丝绸、茶叶四大丝路文明信物，四件信物也在收官仪式上首次海外集中亮相。 车队由比亚迪王朝、海洋、腾势、方程豹、仰望五网四品牌组成，完成高速、山区及城市拥堵等多场景行驶。 两大核心技术经受住万里实景检验，闪充技术做到“5分钟充好、9分钟充饱”，依托全国近万座闪充站化解长途补能难题，天神之眼辅助驾驶则基于日均超2.2亿公里的真实行驶数据持续迭代，有效减轻长距离行车压力。 收官地选在新加坡颇有深意，截至2026年7月，比亚迪已连续19个月位居新加坡乘用车全品牌销量第一，今年1至7月乘用车市场份额达24.7%，纯电市场份额达40.3%。
C | 而新加坡是全球汽车拥有成本最高的市场之一，比亚迪在当地售价不低却持续热销，目前已在当地布局16处零售触点，部分门店开进了核心购物中心。 公开数据显示，2026年1至7月，比亚迪海外累计销量超97万辆，同比增长约76%，7月单月海外销量17.98万辆，同比增长124.3%，新能源汽车已进入全球超120个国家和地区。
Current article:http://ylzdcix.shuazhepenxingshuaisenqienai.buzz/list_zdr/21qscn.html
Published on:15:05:23